hatam_soferet: (Default)
hatam_soferet ([personal profile] hatam_soferet) wrote2005-05-24 01:41 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

So here's me, writing merrily along in my essay, making a passing reference to reading from memory, which some people permit. Mordechai permits, I say, and leave it at that.

Then I realise that actually I need to say WHY he permits. I have a vague idea, but nothing like accurate enough...so I spend the next four hours learning exactly why you can't read from memory. The damndest thing is that the best reason isn't an admissible part of the logic. The best reason is that in a tradition which relies very heavily on precise wording of text, over-reliance on oral transmission will result in a disastrously high level of corruption. But we don't say that, we find instances of the root for "write," and patch them together, saying that the hidden meaning in "write this text in the relevant script" from the book of Esther means "and don't read it without the text in front of you," and that sort of thing.

So before I know it I've got five parenthetical paragraphs. Sigh. They're good, but they can't live where they were born, they were only supposed to be a passing reference. It's up to 9000 words now, and half of it is still in shorthand.

DwTjoWfXcXSqyl

(Anonymous) 2012-02-16 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)
n3 hahomatepnanob n3 Mockbb b Netepbypr (be3 ?ocaaok ha ?poboaax NEN, a tonbko ha batapenkax Pochaho) b 2012 roayNc?onhntenb - uybanc.Bot eto bbn bb aorobop.Bnaenn?2009 roa. Aepokocmnueckoe arehtctbo NASA n hekommepueckar oprahn3aunr CAFE Foundation haunhaot ?pnem 3arbok ha yuactne b copebhobahnn camonetob manon abnaunn Green Flight Challenge, kotopoe aonxho coctortbcr b 2011 roay. Npn3obon ooha kohkypca ?pebbwaet 1,6 mnh aonn. Ety cymmy ?onyunt komahaa, ?peactabnbwar cambn bbctpbn n ?otpebnrownn mehbwe bcero to?nnba b pacuete ha ?accaxnpa camonet. Mnhnmanbhbe tpebobahnr - pa3bntb b ?onete aanbhoctbo b 200 mnnb ckopoctb he mehee 160 km/u, ?oka3ab ?pn etom eooektnbhoctb pacxoaa to?nnba he xyxe, uem 85 ?accaxnpo-knnometpob ha nntp.2011 roa.First place in NASA's Green Flight Challenge went to Pipistrel-USA, for a prize of $1.35 moiilln, and the second-place prize of $120,000 went to team eGenius, NASA announced on 3 oct 2011. The prize purse was the biggest ever awarded for an aviation competition, according to NASA. To win, the aircraft had to fly 200 miles in less than two hours and use less than one gallon of fuel per occupant, or the equivalent in electricity. Pipistrel's Taurus G4 achieved fuel efficiency of 403 passenger miles per gallon at a speed of 107 mph. The results show that "battery-powered electric flight is feasible for general aviation aircraft," according to Pipistrel team leader Jack Langelaan.