The way we divide the Torah-readings nowadays, parashat Naso always falls out adjacent to Shavuot, the festival upon which we celebrate the Giving of the Torah, and upon which we read the Ten Commandments.

Thus it is that the following Midrash is especially appropriate for the Naso/Shavuot period (thus, yes, I should have posted it several weeks ago, but I was busy then and it’s still interesting now), combining as it does the ritual-of-the-suspected-adulteress and the Ten Commandments. Reference: Midrash Tanchuma (ed. Buber), parashat Naso (4).

Our Sages said in the name of R. Hanina, father of R. Aha: The adulterer and adulteress violate all ten commandments of the Decalogue. אמרו רבותינו בשם ר’ חנינא אביו של ר’ אחא הנואף והנואפת עוברים על עשרת הדברות
They said to him: “Nine of them, we understand. But the Sabbath??! How? אמר להם על תשעה אנו מודים, אלא על השבת כיצד
I AM THE LORD THY GOD. Whenever anyone commits adultery with his neighbor’s wife, it is as if he has denied God, as it is written, they denied God, saying, it is not (H)he על אנכי, שכל הנואף אשת חבירו כאילו כופר בהקב”ה, שנאמר כחשו בה’ ויאמרו לא הוא (ירמיה ה יב)
THERE SHALL NOT BE ANY OTHER GODS BEFORE THEE. In this commandment, it says: The Lord thy God is a jealous God, and the parasha of the Sota mentions the husband’s jealousy twice? Why twice? Once for himself, and once for God. As it is written: For it is a minhath qena’oth, a meal-offering of jealousies [plural], two jealousies. לא יהיה, שכתוב בו כי [אנכי] ה’ אלהיך אל קנא (דברים ה ח), ושני פעמים אמור בסוטה ועבר עליו רוח קנאה וקנא את אשתו (במדבר ה יד), ולמה שני פעמים, שהוא מקנא להקב”ה ולבעלה, שנאמר כי מנחת קנאות הוא (שם שם /במדבר ה’/ טו), שהיא שתי קנאות.
THOU SHALT NOT TAKE THE NAME OF THE LORD THY GOD IN VAIN. For the adulterer commits his act, then falsely swears that he has not done it. לא תשא את [שם] ה’ אלהיך, שהוא נואף ונשבע על שוא שלא עשה.
HONOR THY FATHER. For the adulterer impregnates the Sota, and she gives birth, and she tells her husband that it is his child; the embryo grows [into a child, and the child into an adult], who honors the Sota’s husband, thinking this to be the father, and expresses dishonor to the adulterer when seeing him in the street, thinking this not to be the father. כבד את אביך, שהנואף עם הסוטה מתעברת ממנו, ואומרת לבעלה ממך אני מעוברת, והעובר גדול, ומכבד לפני בעלה, סבור שהוא אביו ואינו אביו, ועובר בשוק ומבזה את הנואף, שסבור שאינו אביו.
THOU SHALT NOT KILL. For the adulterer enters the house on the understanding that if caught, he will either kill or be killed. לא תרצח, הנואף נכנס על מנת שאם נתפס או יהרוג או יהרג.
THOU SHALT NOT COMMIT ADULTERY. Well, this one is obvious. לא תנאף, וודאי שהוא נואף.
THOU SHALT NOT STEAL. For he steals his neighbor’s vagina, as it is written: Stolen waters are sweet לא תגנוב, שהוא גונב מקור חבירו, וכן הוא אומר מים גנובים ימתקו וגו’ (משלי ט יז).
THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS. For the Sota lies to her husband, saying: I am pregnant from you. לא תענה ברעך, שמעידה עדות שקר [לבעלה] ואומרת ממך אני מעוברת.
THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOR’S HOUSE. For anyone who commits adultery covets all that belongs to his neighbor. How so? He impregnates the Sota, and leaves, and she gives birth. Her husband thinks that this is his son. When he is about to die, he writes a will, and leaves everything to the “son”, who thus inherits everything, not realizing that he is not the son. Since the adulterer’s act has led to all this, we see that he has coveted all that belongs to his neighbor. לא תחמוד בית רעך ולא תחמוד אשת רעך, שכל מי שחומד אשת חבירו ונואף עמה, חומד כל אשר לחבירו, כיצד כשהוא נואף עמה והולך לו, והיא יולדת ממנו, סבור בעלה שהוא ממנו בא, כשבא להיפטר מן העולם, סבור שאותו הבן שלו, וכותב לו דייתיקי מכל נכסיו, ומורישו כל מה שיש לו, ואינו יודע שאינו בנו, נמצא שהנואף חומד כל מה שיש לו לחבירו
So, R. Hanina, we understand nine. But the Sabbath?! How does the adulterer violate that?!! אמרו לו לר’ חנינא הרי אמרנו תשעה, [זכור את יום] השבת כיצד עובר עליו
He said to them: Sometimes, a common Israelite commits adultery with a priestess, the wife of a priest. She gets pregnant from him, and everyone thinks that the child is the son of the priest, and thus a priest himself. So he goes and serves in the Temple, and sets up firewood and burns it on the Sabbath, and thus violates the Sabbath. [A priest may do this on the Sabbath as part of the Temple work. A non-priest may not.] אמר להם אני אומר לכם פעמים כהן שיש לו אשה כהנת, ישראל נואף בא עליה, והיא יולדת ממנו, סבורים בו שהוא בנו של כהן, ועומד התינוק ומשמש בבית המקדש, ועורך עצים ומעלה בשבת, ונמצא מחלל השבת
Thus, the adulterer and the adulteress violate all ten commandments of the Decalogue. הרי עשרת דברות שהסוטה עוברת עם הנואף

(Translation courtesy Gabriel Wasserman.)

So this is interesting as a text, but it’s the more interesting for the meta-message, I think. What’s it saying? That everything is connected. Sometimes the connections are obvious. Sometimes they’re not obvious. But, because halakhot are all interconnected, messing with one thing is going to have an impact on other, apparently unrelated, things.

Yes, you might say that the example above is so unlikely as to be preposterous, and it’s true that in general we don’t stretch ourselves to accommodate rampantly unlikely possibilities. But that’s not the point.

The point is not that you should not commit adultery lest your offspring come to serve erroneously in the Temple (not that I am endorsing adultery, you understand); the point is that everything in the halakhic system has the power to affect everything else. More about that shortly.

Mirrored from hasoferet.com.


From: (Anonymous)

dFlDZkSmZrdfmKWkbG


, I find it COMPLETELY RIDICULOUS that he had a meeting on coefnrence Sunday AND an extra meeting ON EASTER. Give me a freakin' break. I remember reading a talk (I think it was in coefnrence) with a quote regarding meetings that said that it's not a bad thing to have a meeting go for a shorter time than was originally scheduled. Yay!! Don't I wish. I read a book by Gene R. Cook that I thought had some really good ideas. He talks about when he and his family lived in South America - every night was Family Home Evening, due simply to lack of other worthwhile activities elsewhere. When they moved back to the states (UT), he counted 37 church activities in one month for which at least one member of his family was "expected" to attend. His bishop approached him, concerned that his family was not supporting the ward. "What do you mean, Bishop?" The bishop said that there had been a scout activity (or something) the night before, and the Cooks were supposed to have attended but didn't (in addition to other activities). Elder Cook gently put the bishop in his place. "Bishop, had we come to the church last night we would have missed out on an excellent family devotional that we held in our home. Besides, I believe that the church is meant to support the family; not the other way around." Even in Darin's stake council meeting yesterday, when talking about scheduling activities, it was mentioned that two questions need to be asked: Does it increase testimonies of the Savior? Does it bring families closer together? Answering yes to these two questions means it's a worthwhile activity. lyle - I like your crumbs/snack-sized bites analogy. It can't always be a feast, can it?yen - blech. get well.
.

Profile

hatam_soferet: (Default)
hatam_soferet

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45 678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags