names of awesome

Writing Shelach Lecha, the bit where the spies are about to go check out the land of Canaan.

They list the names of the people who are going on the trip.

I like playing with the names.

Best of all I like גדי בן סוסי, Goaty-baby ben Horsie. Of course, then you run into problems with גדיאל, Goaty-god, but hey. We make up for it with מכיאל, SMITEY-GOD, and his friend גאיאל בן מכי, Gooey-el ben Mucky. And ופסי, Vaffsy, who seems to have wandered in here from a Wagner epic, gets culturally bemused in company with Amiel ben Gimli, visiting from a Tolkien epic. What're they doing here? Who knows, but it brightens up the morning.

Proofreading, part 27

Of course, people say “um, no actually” to me, being female. It wasn’t the handless guy’s fault he had no hands, it’s not my fault I’m female. He just didn’t have the physical makeup to write a valid Torah and that was too bad; I don’t have the physical makeup to write a valid Torah and that’s too bad also.

Really, I do know a lot of decent people who have to say “um, no actually” to me, and they do act like yesterday’s posited rabbi – feeling really sorry that he’s got to say “um, no actually” to this person who’s put in so much effort and so badly wants to be part of the community and it isn’t their fault they can’t participate through this activity.

So why’s it different? why am I expecting the handless guy and the Braille-writer to suck it up, while I go right ahead and write Torahs?

You could say I’m just a hypocrite, a case of “one rule for us, one rule for them.” Some people do say that. I see where they’re coming from.

Way I see it, women doing men’s things isn’t exactly a physical makeup thing, it’s about how gender affects one’s communal status. Women are barred from Torah writing in the context of societal strata; some classes of people may participate, some may not. In particular, the full citizen, the adult male in good standing, may participate in the transmission of the community’s symbolic centre, and the adjunct classes of women, children, and slaves, may not.

This is perfectly sensible as far as it goes, except that in our days it is a matter of principle that women not be an adjunct class.

Such a statement requires some unpacking. More on that tomorrow.

Mirrored from hasoferet.com.